Re: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix

["DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage at alcatel-lucent.com>]

For additional information, this was originally targetted as an
essential correction, but we agreed at IETF#70 that it should instead we
progressed as a standalone BCP as it was not essential. 

It does not not directly update RFC 3261, and is currently not intended
to.

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Willis
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:32 PM
> To: SIP IETF
> Subject: [Sip] WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix
> 
> 
> I believe we're ready to do working group last call on the 
> Record- Route guidelines draft. Please get comments back to 
> the list before July 29.
> 
> 
> See:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-record-rout
> e-fix-03.txt
> 
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip 
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip