Re: [Sip] Late Milestones (was Re: Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72)

[Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com>]

On Jul 18, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:

> > Jul 2007 Location Conveyance with SIP to IESG
> > 	-- Waiting on face-to-face, but in GEOPRIV
>
> This one is interesting: I believe that it was not a good idea to have
> the document in SIP when most of the controversial discussions  
> happen in
> GEOPRIV, i.e. the encoding wasn't been the problem --  the semantic  
> was.
>
>
> Spreading topics over different groups always makes the process more
> complicated.

Interesting coincidence with my insanely-cross-posted message of just  
now.

> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> PS: I also have to add that GEOPRIV clearly isn't the easiest group I
> have dealt with. Hence, the delay is probably not so surprising.
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip