Re: [Sip] Alternative SIP Identity Approach (was re: Thoughts on SIP Identity)

["Dan Wing" <dwing at cisco.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:50 AM
> To: Adam Roach
> Cc: Dan Wing; 'SIP IETF'; 'Adam Uzelac'; 'Dean Willis'
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Alternative SIP Identity Approach (was re: 
> Thoughts on SIP Identity)
> 
> 
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:30 , Adam Roach wrote:
> 
> >
> > Yes, that has the right property -- enough information to  
> > reconstruct which changes were made, and by whom.
> 
> That might be the right property but on the other hand,  there is a  
> big difference between the two following properties of a system.
> 
> 1) the receiver can tell what intermediaries made changes and what  
> changes were made
> 
> 2) the sender was aware of, and authorized, the changes made by  
> intermediaries
> 
> I can see ways we could build either of these. But right now it seem  
> unclear on what we are even trying to accomplish.

I would like to accomplish end-to-end identity through SBCs, rather
than hop-by-hop identity that exists with today's RFC4474 through SBCs.

-d


> Cullen <with my individual contributor hat on>
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip