Re: [Sip] SDP in 200 OK?

[Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at cisco.com>]

See 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-08.txt

In short, its legal for it to either be absent, or same as the first 
answer. Absent is preferred.

	Thanks,
	Paul

Thomas george wrote:
>  What will be SDP in the 200 OK to INVITE, if PRACK with Answer and 
> UPDATE transaction happened before the INVITE's 200 is sent?
>
>  
>
> rgds,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip