Re: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound

[jh at tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen)]

Christer Holmberg writes:

 > Now, in your example, if OB_1 and REG_2 fail you don't still don't have
 > redundancy :)

in the very common case that i have described earlier on this mailing
list, obx and regx are paired and run on the same host.  they are not
separate entities that can fail on their own.

 > I guess this all comes back to Dean's question whether we need some new
 > text into the draft.
 > 
 > In order to avoid delaying the Outbound spec even more, I guess it could
 > also be an extension draft:"Outbound with multiple contacts", or
 > something like that...

huh, once ob is out as rfc, it is way too late to do anything about it.
ob i-d must be got right the first shot.  another (better) alternative
is to publish the component rfcs that we have identified first and once
they are out, start working on ob i-d.

-- juha
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip