Re: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound

["Francois Audet" <audet at nortel.com>]

No.

I'm saying a new draft on redundant registration is needed, and we can leave
outbound AS IS.

I thought about this more.

I think what it means, is NOT using "Supported: outbound", but using 
the +sip.instance and reg-id in the REGISTER. Perhaps with a different
"Support: redundant-registrations" or whatever.

The reg-ids will distinguish the multiple registrations. The +sip.instance
will correlate them.

This will be in line with what we did with GRUU which also can use the
+sip.instance.

A new draft describing this should be fairly simple to do, and we wouldn't
derail the process, and it would be very much in line with sip-outbound.

Makes sense?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh at tutpro.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 23:54
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat; 
> sip at ietf.org; Christer Holmberg
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound
> 
> Francois Audet writes:
> 
>  > Rather, I think this should be a new draft, and it should 
> be  > independent from outbound.
> 
> so do you now finally agree to base outbound drfat on two new 
> drafts that are also independent of outbound: dialog 
> connection re-use and keepalive?
> 
> -- juha
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip