![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
We missed the cut-off day to submit version 9. We will submit this to the system on 7/27 when the system re-opens again. In version 9, we made the following changes: * Updated the Abstract to state that this draft captures the current use cases. We removed the statement "This document captures them to provide a reference". * Moved all the references to the Individual Draft to Informative References. * Added Term Draft in the Terminology Section * Re-draw the Reference Architecture Diagram to respond to John's comment * Re-worded Section 4 to respond to John's and Jean-Francois's comment * Corrected all the ENUM entries * Added all the changes addressed by John and Alex * Replaced the text in Section Static Indirect Peering Use Case with Jean-Francois's proposed text * Added References for DNS-SRV and DNS-NAPTR * Removed Section 7 Federations completely Thanks, Yiu -----Original Message----- From: speermint-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:speermint-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee, Yiu Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:47 PM To: john.elwell at siemens.com; speermint at ietf.org Subject: Re: [Speermint] Partial reviewofdraft-ietf-speermint-consolidated-usecases-08 Alex and John, Thanks for taking the time to review the draft. The comments are great. Adam and I will address your comments and target to release a new version next week. Thanks, Yiu
Attachment:
draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-09.pdf
Description: draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-09.pdf
_______________________________________________ Speermint mailing list Speermint at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint