Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-tls document
"John Calcote" <jcalcote@novell.com> Tue, 05 September 2006 04:46 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKSpt-0005oA-0G; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:46:57 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKSps-0005ji-18 for syslog@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:46:56 -0400
Received: from sinclair.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKSpq-0004aD-Mw for syslog@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:46:56 -0400
Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by sinclair.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:46:53 -0600
Message-Id: <44FCAD53.37FF.0081.0@novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.1
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:48:51 -0600
From: John Calcote <jcalcote@novell.com>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>, Miao Fuyou <miaofy@huawei.com>, syslog@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-tls document
References: <14ed01c6cbb4$c17526f0$0400a8c0@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <14ed01c6cbb4$c17526f0$0400a8c0@china.huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=__Part7356C7A3.2__="
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5011df3e2a27abcc044eaa15befcaa87
Cc:
X-BeenThere: syslog@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/syslog>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: syslog-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Here are a few gnits: 1. Section 5.3, para 1, sentence 2, ...multiple TLS Records. 2. Section 5.3, ABNF, It's not necessarily obvious that the numeric fields are decimal (base 10). 3. Section 5.3.1, para 1, sentence 3, ...there is no upper limit. 4. Section 5.3.1, para 1, sentence 4, ...must be able to process frames with...2048 octets. 5. Section 5.3.1, para 1, sentence 5, ...be able to receive frames with...8192 octets. More later... John ----- John Calcote (jcalcote@novell.com) Sr. Software Engineeer Novell, Inc. >>> "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> 8/29/2006 3:47 PM >>> Hi, This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last Call for the following document: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-03 .txt The Working Group Last Call for this document will end September 12. To help get these document reviewed throughly, we are seeking volunteers to review the documents for the following special reviews: 1) Spelling and grammar, 2) boilerplates and reference review, 3) security review The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews before we submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the document and it looks fine, please post a statement that you have reviewed and found the document acceptable. Obviously, if it does not look acceptable please identify your objections, preferably with suggested text that would make it acceptable. Thanks, David Harrington dharrington@huawei.com dbharrington@comcast.net ietfdbh@comcast.net co-chair, Syslog WG _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
_______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
- [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-tls docu… David Harrington
- RE: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-tls … Miao Fuyou
- version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslog] W… Chris Lonvick
- RE: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… Rainer Gerhards
- Re: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-tls … John Calcote
- Re: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… Balazs Scheidler
- RE: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… Miao Fuyou
- Re: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… tom.petch
- RE: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… Miao Fuyou
- RE: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… Balazs Scheidler
- RE: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… Chris Lonvick
- Re: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… tom.petch
- RE: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslo… David Harrington
- protocol was Re: version field in syslog-tls - wa… tom.petch
- RE: protocol was Re: version field in syslog-tls … Miao Fuyou
- Re: protocol was Re: version field in syslog-tls … tom.petch