[Syslog] Syslog-sign: Editorial nits, part 2

To: <syslog at ietf.org>
Subject: [Syslog] Syslog-sign: Editorial nits, part 2
From: <Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:40:44 +0300
Delivered-to: ietfarch-syslog-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: syslog at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/syslog>
List-help: <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:syslog@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: syslog-bounces at ietf.org
Thread-index: Acjtebn3Ju70v1sPSlKGXULEa6UOiA==
Thread-topic: Syslog-sign: Editorial nits, part 2

Needs a reference to RFC 5280 (for PKIX certificates).

It seems references [3] (NIST SP 800-90) and [6] (RFC 3414) 
could be informative references instead of normative.

Reference [11] (RFC 2119) needs to be normative.

Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Prev by Date: [Syslog] Syslog-sign: Minor clarifications, part 2
Next by Date: Re: [Syslog] Syslog-sign: Certificate chains?
Previous by thread: [Syslog] Syslog-sign: Minor clarifications, part 2
Next by thread: [Syslog] Syslog-sign: 6.2. Flexibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Syslog] Syslog-sign: Editorial nits, part 2

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.