Re: [TLS] extension number conflict
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 08 February 2007 16:26 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFC6a-0001JJ-PD; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:26:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFC6Z-0001J7-21 for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:26:39 -0500
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com ([66.150.120.2]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFC6X-0001ij-QJ for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:26:39 -0500
Received: (qmail 20141 invoked by uid 0); 8 Feb 2007 16:26:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (71.246.224.157) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2007 16:26:30 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:26:28 -0500
To: Mike <mike-list@pobox.com>, tls@ietf.org
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] extension number conflict
In-Reply-To: <45CB4922.1060504@pobox.com>
References: <45CB4922.1060504@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Cc:
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1HFC6a-0001JJ-PD@megatron.ietf.org>
IANA makes assignments when the documents are approved. It should have "TBD" in the document until that happens. Russ At 11:00 AM 2/8/2007, Mike wrote: >The number used for the cert_hash_types extension in >draft-ietf-tls-rfc4346-bis-02.txt is 6, but this >conflicts with the user_mapping extension defined in >RFC 4681. > >Has the IANA been asked to assign a new number for >the cert_hash_types extension? > >Thanks, > >Mike > >_______________________________________________ >TLS mailing list >TLS@lists.ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Stefan Santesson
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Paul Hoffman
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Pasi.Eronen
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict Mike
- Re: [TLS] extension number conflict tom.petch
- RE: [TLS] extension number conflict Stefan Santesson