Re: [Tools-discuss] historic mailing list archives
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tools-discuss] historic mailing list archives



Hi, Frank,

I don't think the IETF can depend on gmane or any other external archiving service.

There are simply too many past examples of such services that have been used to host IETF lists that have disappeared, as evidenced by the defunct archive links on http://tools.ietf.org/wg/concluded

Lars

On 2008-7-18, at 16:26, ext Frank Ellermann wrote:

Lars Eggert wrote:

all this is about archive features, not about archive
longevity/availability. I agree that they are nice
features, maybe even essential ones, but availability
trumps them all.

I use GMaNe for 5+ years, sometimes there are glitches,
as with IETF lists hosted by the IETF, only different.

If you try to build new archives based on whatever you
find somewhere it would be a huge project.

This is the case even for recently concluded WGs such
as pki4ipsec or, ahem, infamous WGs such as newtrk.

<http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.newtrk>  NNTP tells
me that GMaNe has 1214 articles (up to 2006-06).  It's
hard to tell what Google knows about this, you could
try two patterns:

<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.newtrk/*>
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.newtrk/*>

However cross-posted articles to more than one list
available on GMaNe will only get an URL in the first
group.  If somebody posted to the general list *and*
Newtrk (that happened) it would AFAIK get only one
permalink on the general list.

To get around this you could try the URL patterns
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.*>
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.*>

But then you'd get articles more than once if they
are available under different patterns.  Maybe you
could use specific patterns for lists only on GMaNe,
and general patterns with a "negative score" to get
your preferred archives for other lists first.

Google will anyway add its own scoring ideas, CSEs
are rather fuzzy whatever you do.

Frank

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.