Re: [Uri-review] Re: early draft of a "geo:" URI scheme.

[Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi at gmx.net>]

* Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
>Consider calculating the spatial distance between two geo: URIs. That would
>not work with, let's say - a "data:"; URI, because the semantics are not
>defined (Note to myself: add "distance calculation" to the draft?)

Say you make a application/geo type with the same syntax and semantics
as the proposed scheme. Then it seems you can just do that using e.g.

  data:application/geo,... <-> data:application/geo,...

Other than the additional level of indirection I can see no difference.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review