proposed "xmpp" NID
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org> Wed, 01 November 2006 16:46 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfJEc-0001U5-6X; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:46:38 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeePx-00047z-W5 for urn-nid@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:11:38 -0500
Received: from corp-fw-main.jabber.com ([207.182.164.14] helo=wrk187.corp.jabber.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeePw-0000GE-Dt for urn-nid@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:11:37 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wrk187.corp.jabber.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C3F57F65B for <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:11:35 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <45466A87.8090606@jabber.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:11:35 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Thunderbird/1.5.0.7 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
Jabber-ID: stpeter@jabber.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080406040502070101050108"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: be922d419820e291bde1362184dc32fd
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:46:37 -0500
Subject: proposed "xmpp" NID
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: urn-nid-bounces@apps.ietf.org
The following NID template is extracted from an Internet-Draft I just submitted to the Secretariat; until the I-D is published, you may find it here: http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn-00.txt http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-xmpp-urn-00.html Review from folks on this list would be appreciated. Thanks! /psa ****** Namespace ID: The Namespace ID "xmpp" is requested. Registration Information: Version 1 Date: <when submitted> Declared Registrant of the Namespace: Registering organization Organization: Jabber Software Foundation Address: P.O. Box 1641, Denver, CO 80201 USA Designated contact Role: XMPP Registrar Email: registrar@jabber.org Declaration of Syntactic Structure: The Namespace Specific String (NSS) of all URNs that use the "xmpp" NID shall have the following structure: urn:xmpp:{ShortName}:{SubName} The keywords have the following meaning: (1) the "ShortName" is a US-ASCII string that conforms to the URN syntax requirements (see RFC 2141) and defines a particular protocol or format that is used as an XMPP extension (2) the "SubName" is a US-ASCII string that conforms to the URN syntax requirements (see RFC 2141) and defines a particular subset of the relevant protocol or format. The JSF's XMPP Registrar function shall be responsible for managing the assignment of both "ShortName" and "SubName" strings and maintaining a registry of resulting namespaces at <http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html>. The XMPP Registrar may also assign URNs in sub-trees below the level of the ShortName or SubName as needed for use in various XMPP extensions. Relevant Ancillary Documentation: Information about the JSF's XMPP Registrar function can be found at <http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/>. Identifier Uniqueness Considerations: The XMPP Registrar is already responsible for managing the assignment of XML namespace names of the form "http://jabber.org/protocol/{ShortName}" and "http://jabber.org/protocol/{ShortName}#{SubName}" (e.g., "http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub" and "http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info"). If the "xmpp" NID is approved, the XMPP Registrar shall simply modify the syntax of the namespace names it assigns from "http://jabber.org/protocol/{ShortName}" and "http://jabber.org/protocol/{ShortName}#{SubName}" to "urn:xmpp:{ShortName}" and "urn:xmpp:{ShortName}:{SubName}". The XMPP Registrar is shall ensure the uniqueness of all ShortName strings and of all SubName strings within the context of a given ShortName through checking such names against the list of existing namespace names (this process is not currently documented, but documentation may be added to XEP-0053, which is the controlling specification for the XMPP Registrar). It is envisioned that the XMPP Registrar shall in all cases directly ensure the uniqueness of the assigned strings and that the XMPP Registrar shall not assign secondary responsibility for management of any sub-trees. However, the XMPP Registrar may assign URNs in sub-trees below the level of the ShortName or SubName as needed for use in various XMPP extensions. The resulting URNs shall not be re-assigned. Identifier Persistence Considerations: The XMPP Registrar shall provide clear documentation of the registered uses of the "xmpp" NID in the form of XMPP Extension Protocol (XEP) specifications published at <http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/> as well as a registry of the registered namespaces themselves at <http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/namespaces.html>. Process of Identifier Assignment: The XMPP Registrar's processes for ShortName and SubName assignment are not currently documented, but such strings are typically generated by the author of the relevant XMPP Extension Protocol specification and checked by the XMPP Registrar against the list of existing namespace names to ensure relevance, memorability, and uniqueness (documentation of this process may be added to XEP-0053, which is the controlling specification for the XMPP Registrar). Assignment of URNs within the "xmpp" tree is reserved to the Jabber Software Foundation, specifically to its XMPP Registrar function as specified in XEP-0053. Process for Identifier Resolution: The namespace is not listed with a Resolution Discovery System. Rules for Lexical Equivalence: No special considerations; the rules for lexical equivalence specified in RFC 2141 apply. Conformance with URN Syntax: No special considerations. Validation Mechanism: None specified. Scope: Global. ******
- proposed "xmpp" NID Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: proposed "xmpp" NID Michael Mealling
- Re: proposed "xmpp" NID Leslie Daigle
- Re: proposed "xmpp" NID Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: proposed "xmpp" NID Peter Saint-Andre