RE: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything good enough? - Spoofing stats)

[Paul Judge <paul.judge@ciphertrust.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hadmut Danisch [mailto:hadmut@danisch.de] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: Paul Judge
> Cc: asrg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (was RE: Is there anything 
> good enough? - Spoofing stats)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > >   - the new RMX RR will never be seriously considered in 
> the DNS WG.
> 
> Wow, that is an first class argument. Shouldn't we let the WG itself
> decide it instead of Vernon?
> 
> 
> 
> > >   - if by some fluke that happens it will never pass Last 
> > > Call in a DNS WRK.
> 
> 
> Wow, another first class argument. We are blessed to have such
> a genius like Vernon who can predict other peoples opinion. 
> 
> 
> > >   - if everyone is asleep there, it won't pass IESG review or 
> > > main list
> > >      Last Call.
> 
> Another one of these. I wonder what we need IETF, IRTF, working groups
> and mailing lists for if we have a fortune teller like Vernon.

Hadmut, we can do without the sarcasm and personal remarks. This is a
technical mailing list. Please stick to the topics.

> 
> > 
> What does Microsoft need Bill Gates for if we have Vernon to define
> their Business Model? Why do we need to fight against Spam at all if
> Spam perfectly meets companies business models?

More personal remarks.


> > > I'm beginning to get the impression that RMX proponents are 
> > > egregiously unaware of how SMTP works and is commonly used.  
> 
> Wow, another good argument. Paul, I guess that could be your 
> favourite...
> 
> 
> Paul, I really do applaude for your wise and experienced way
> of group leadership and your profound ability to identify
> good arguments.

More sarcasm and personal attacks. I never said that the arguments were
good. I just said that it is a clear list of arguments. This means that it
is organized in a format that allows technical debate without irrelevant
arguments and personal comments. However, in your reply you managed to turn
this back into a personal conversation.

People please stick with the issues. 
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg