[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Asrg] RMX evaluation (Monkeys vs. RMX)
At 12:33 AM 5/9/03 -0400, Paul Judge wrote:
>
>> > Hadmut and/or Mike, please read the other links that Vernon
>> provided "
>> > http://www.google.com/search?q=match+sender+domain+hotmail
>>
>>
>> Paul, you will not seriously ask me to comment a google search
>> reply. That's ridiculous. Please state exactly what you would
>> like to have comments on. Do you believe this is the way to
>> chair a working group?
>
>Yes, this is part of chairing a group. BTW, this is a research group not a
>working group. Either way, someone has brought to your attention related and
>previous work. Your duty as author of the RMX proposal is to provide a
>comparison between your proposal and other available mechanisms to show the
>benefit of the new system. So asking you to be familiar with these previous
>systems and to provide that related work discussion is part of one of my
>responsibilities of ensuring that the proposals are as complete as possible.
>
For the record, I object to a directed request that a contributor
read and comment on an excess of 6,000 web pages.
Scott Nelson <scott@spamwolf.com>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg