[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation

To: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
From: Mike Rubel <asrg@mikerubel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: asrg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <12065.1052419796@kanga.nu>
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org

[ regarding why you believe Vixie's proposal is preferable to RMX ]

JCL> It also has the advantage of not changing its behaviour significantly 
JCL> as penetration thresholds grow.

Hi J.C.,

I dont't quite understand what you mean by this; could you please clarify?

Thanks,
Mike

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
  - From: J C Lawrence

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] How many legitimate SMTP servers?
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation / Paul Vixie's procedure
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
Next by thread: [Asrg] Re: RMX evaluation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread