[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Consent Proposal

At 07:53 AM 6/27/2003 +0100, Jon Kyme wrote:


> >I don't believe that this adds up to what you claim.
> >
> >There was some more fundamental (but probably premature)
> >discussion of "consent" early in the life this group.
>
> The charter goes on and on about consent, however aside from Gordon's
> HTML
> blocking thread, there has been no discussion of that.

You might be interested in the threads starting with
<E18r0iB-0000Ci-00@mail.nitros9.org> "[Asrg] The Consent 4-Tuple"
and
Original message at https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg00669.html

<E18sKmk-00009r-00@argon.connect.org.uk> "[Asrg] What would consent look
like?"
Original message at https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg01022.html:

---snip---
Consent might look something like this:
applies-to: user@domain.example
classes: set of message classifications
access: allow | deny
scope: local | organisational | global
---snip---

And

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg