[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

6. Proposals - Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email (was re: [Asrg] Proposal: Separate ISP(s) for "guaranteed delivery" of email)



At 11:26 AM 7/4/2003 -0400, Kee Hinckley wrote:

At 11:07 AM -0400 7/4/03, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:07:20PM -0400, Kee Hinckley wrote

 >   How much do they care; 75 cents' worth ?  It's their decision, just
 >like with snail-mail versus courirer.

 No.  That's a sender decision.  I'm talking about a receiver
 decision.  And the problem is that if the receiver starts paying for
 receipt of messages (e.g. to their sales line) then they are open to
 a different kind of for-profit spam.
  Please re-read my original proposal.  It includes the sentence...

 The general public could join with free "read-only" accounts, with
 the option of sending one-off messages for a low fee.
  Most customers of UPS/Fedex/Purolator are businesses, and have
accounts with them.  But individuals do use couriers occasionally when
the need arises, and pay a one-off fee.  The "Business ISP" is to be
a "sender-pays" system.  The sender *ALWAYS* pays for messages sent.
The receiver *NEVER* pays for messages recieved.
One of us is misunderstanding. I'm not sure which of us.
My issue as a business is how do I ensure that I reliably get email from customers who aren't paying to send.
Perhaps some kind of a COD mechanism?

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg