RE: [dccp] DCCP and low-delay interactive media

["Arne Lie" <arne.lie at item.ntnu.no>]

Lars, and Sally,

OK, thanks, and sorry, then I apologize so much to Sally! I will then
*assume* nothing yet about any WG consensus. I was guessing that it did
exist, and was hoping someone would answer my questions having that
"authority" (actually I wrote "I would very much like the opinions to the
addressed questions from this group.", but I realize now that that statment
was not precise enough to call for what I *was* asking for). So I will, as
Sally pointed out, restrict the context of her answer to her *personal*
beliefs. I will look into RFC2418. Thanks again, Lars!

Arne

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert at netlab.nec.de] 
> Sent: 13. oktober 2005 11:26
> To: Arne Lie
> Cc: floyd at icir.org; dccp at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dccp] DCCP and low-delay interactive media 
> 
> Arne,
> 
> On Oct 13, 2005, at 10:16, Arne Lie wrote:
> > Thank you for your answers, they were very informative! 
> Even that you 
> > stress these are your personal statements, I assume these opinions 
> > have a consensus in the DCCP working group as well.
> 
> that's a somewhat dangerous conclusion, especially because 
> Sally specifically states that this is her personal viewpoint.
> 
> Although I'm sure many DCCP people will agree with Sally on 
> these points, "WG consensus" is a pretty strictly defined 
> term that is established through a careful procedure (see 
> RFC2418). For these specific items, that process hasn't started.
> 
> Lars
> --
> Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network 
> Laboratories
> 
>