Re: [dhcwg] minutes on draft-pruss-dhcp-auth-dsl-03

["David W. Hankins" <David_Hankins at isc.org>]

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 05:24:30PM -0400, Ralph Droms wrote:
> I was thinking of the "DHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption", RFC 
> 5107.

OK, then we are talking about a limited subset of deployments, as this
does not allow the relay to see all the messages where two relays are
involved (at INIT/REBINDING/etc, drops to one, not the other), nor
where more than one server is involed (differing sets of information
supplied is normal operation).

Right?  Or am I remembering the PD discussions wrong?


For completeness, it also presumes no support of DHCPINFORM messages
(servers reply to ciaddr not giaddr, so relays will not see server
replies), which I assumed already as this draft is purposed to
authorize access to IP address resources, which DHCPINFORM does not
convey.

-- 
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil?	 https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg