[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ipcdn] RE: Q of docsIfCmtsChannelUtUtilization for Upstream
Hi Minnie,
It is debatable if the current text imposes the fixed bandwidth
allocation.
We believe the text should be taken in the context of the measurement
interval. From that perspective we think It won't preclude or limit the
CMTS capabilities to change dynamically the % bandwidth allocation.
Internally at CL, Greg and I looked at the case and probably the
proposed text below may help.
-> added at the end of the below paragraph: "over the most recent
utilization interval."
For an upstream interface that has multiple logical
upstream channels enabled, the utilization index is a
weighted sum of utilization indices for the logical
channels. The weight for each utilization index is the
percentage of upstream minislots allocated for the
corresponding logical channel over the most recent
utilization interval.
Eduardo, Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Minnie Lu [mailto:milu@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 6:25 PM
To: Jean-Francois Mule; Eduardo Cardona; Greg White
Cc: milu@cisco.com; DOCSIS OSS Majordomo List
Subject: Q of docsIfCmtsChannelUtUtilization for Upstream
Hi, all,
I have a question about upstream docsIfCmtsChannelUtUtilization. In
the
description, it says:
"Upstream Channel Utilization Index:
The upstream channel utilization index is expressed as a
percentage of minislots utilized on the physical channel,
regardless of burst type. For an Initial Maintenance
region, the minislots for the complete region are
considered utilized if the CMTS received an upstream
burst within the region from any CM on the physical
channel. For contention REQ and REQ/DATA regions, the
minislots for a transmission opportunity within the
region are considered utilized if the CMTS received an
upstream burst within the opportunity from any CM on the
physical channel. For all other regions, utilized
minislots are those in which the CMTS granted
bandwidth to any unicast SID on the physical channel.
For an upstream interface that has multiple logical
upstream channels enabled, the utilization index is a
weighted sum of utilization indices for the logical
channels. The weight for each utilization index is the
percentage of upstream minislots allocated for the
corresponding logical channel.
Example:
If 75% of bandwidth is allocated to the first logical
channel and 25% to the second, and the utilization
indices for each are 60 and 40 respectively, the
utilization index for the upstream physical channel is
(60 * 0.75) + (40 * 0.25) = 55. This figure
applies to the most recent utilization interval."
Q: for multiple logical channels enabled case, why can it be still
"a percentage of minislots utilized on the physical channel,
regardless
of burst type." ? That is, (the sum of minislots utilized for all
logical
channels) /
(the sum of total minislots for all
logical
channels)
In the current description, it seems that CMTS must support fixed %
of
bandwidth allocated for each logical channel, I cannot find such
requirement in RFIv2.0 spec. Also according to the RFIv2.0 spec, some
CMTS
vendor might choose to support that the % could be changed dynamically
at
the run time for logical channels or some vendors might choose to
support
dynamical bandwidth allocation without any fixed %.
So may I suggest to remove the follow statements from the description
of
docsIfCmtsChannelUtUtilization ?
" For an upstream interface that has multiple logical
upstream channels enabled, the utilization index is a
weighted sum of utilization indices for the logical
channels. The weight for each utilization index is the
percentage of upstream minislots allocated for the
corresponding logical channel.
Example:
If 75% of bandwidth is allocated to the first logical
channel and 25% to the second, and the utilization
indices for each are 60 and 40 respectively, the
utilization index for the upstream physical channel is
(60 * 0.75) + (40 * 0.25) = 55. This figure
applies to the most recent utilization interval."
If I miss any thing, please advice me !
Thanks a lot for your help !
Minnie
_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
IPCDN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn