RE: IPR-WG

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Allen Lo wrote:
> Can you clarify why you feel that way?  Do you feel that the problems
> raised on the mailing list and at the SF meeting don't exist?  And why
> do you feel further investigation should not be pursued?

One may gather some data by searching for "nortel" under
http://www.ietf.org/ipr and looking at the disclosures.

(All seem to be RAND or RAND++ to me..)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Zebarth [mailto:zebarth@nortelnetworks.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:41 AM
> To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
> Subject: IPR-WG 
> 
> 
> 
> I have been following this email thread and I was at the IETF IPR-WG meeting. 
> 
> To date based on what I have read, heard and saw in regards to this subject matter area, I still see no requirement that would necessitate a recharter of the IPR-WG at this time.  Thus I am taking this opportunity to go on record saying that I do not support a recharter of the IPR-WG at this time.
> 
> Kindest regards, 
> 
> Joe Zebarth 
> Dept. 6L41 
> ATI Strategic Standards 
> Nortel Networks (Canada) 
> Phone: +1 613 765 8481 
> 
> 

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg