Re: <draft-ietf-ipr-technology-rights-06.txt>

["todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>]

Bert, So section 5 tells people what is what -  I think that this is
ridiculous and negligent in nature since it creates a liability rather than
fixing one. The problems with the editors doing any editing to the drafts
and the RFCs are that they are part of the work-creation  and copyright
release process then and it becomes impossible to testify as to what was
submitted or its intent that way, and after all this IS supposed to be a
standards process, so that means that the IP's that are submitted are
complete otherwise the IETF's editors will have a further liability for
their actions, unless perhaps that was your intent here.

Todd

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 8:09 AM
Subject: FW: <draft-ietf-ipr-technology-rights-06.txt>


> All,
>
> Sect 5 tells people that RFC-Editor will add text for the required
> IPR statements for stds track RFCs.
>
> I contend that it is is much better to have authors/editors add that
> text in their Internt-Drafts, so that it gets seen during WG and
> IETF Last Calls, so that whoever believes that he/she needs to
> comment is clearly pointed out that they need to think about it.
>
> Thanks,
> Bert
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg