[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PWE3] CW length



Stewart,

You mean sequence number, not length, and I support the consensus for (a).

Cheers,
Andy

-------

At 5/6/2005 07:31 +0100, Stewart Bryant wrote:
I have another area that I need to test consensus on - the CW length text.

We have three options:

a) Say that the semantics of the length field is PW type specific
and is defined in the encap definition.

b) Define two modes - skip zero and use zero - and say that the
PW type uses the most appropriate.

c) The OPTIONAL / MANDATORY text that was last proposed.



I think that the consensus of the WG is to reject (c).

(b) documents what have used in the existing encap drafts.

I detect a mild consensus for (a).

Is that correct?

- Stewart

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3